Longevity Conferences 2023
Curated list of Longevity Conferences, where you can explore the latest research and developments in the field of aging and longevity.
A unique study evaluated the impact of long-term cannabis use on biological aging and social, financial and health preparedness for old life.
Cannabis has become legalized in many countries around the world. Easy access to it raises a question: Are there long-term consequences of cannabis use? Available evidence suggests that prolonged use of cannabis is associated with poorer functioning in several areas, such as cognitive, financial, and social functioning, support of healthy aging, and longevity. It leads to the hypothesis that people using cannabis long-term might be less prepared for the demands of old age. So far, only a handful of studies have evaluated cannabis users beyond their young adulthood. Therefore, Madeline H. Meier conducted extensive research on long-term cannabis users.
In this paper published in Lancet Healthy Longevity, Madeline H. Meier’s team tested if long-term cannabis users show accelerated biological aging in midlife and poorer health, financial, and social preparedness for old age. Participants of the study were a cohort of 1037 individuals from New Zealand, followed to the age of 45 years. Meier assessed cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol use and dependence at ages 18, 21, 26, 32, 38, and 45 years. Biological aging and health, social and financial preparedness for old age were estimated at the age of 45 years. Long-term cannabis users were compared with five different groups:
Long-term cannabis users presented statistically significant accelerated biological aging. They were also less prepared to manage later-life health, financial, and social demands than non-users. Long-term tobacco or alcohol users showed similar results. The study suggested that cannabis associations of long-term cannabis users were not linked to socioeconomic origins, childhood IQ, childhood self-control, or family substance-dependence history. Long-term cannabis users also tended to polysubstance dependence, which impacted the accelerated biological aging and poor financial and health preparedness but not their poor social preparedness.
Long-term cannabis use seems to be the culprit, but the real challenge to healthy aging is not the use of any specific substance but rather the long-term use of multiple substances, which many users pursue. Holistic midlife interventions for long-term cannabis users are needed to support them in building their health, financial, and social capital and help sustain them through later life. Quitting cannabis may help with this goal. Efforts are also needed to provide the same help for long-term tobacco and alcohol users.
Cannabis has become legalized in many countries around the world. Easy access to it raises a question: Are there long-term consequences of cannabis use? Available evidence suggests that prolonged use of cannabis is associated with poorer functioning in several areas, such as cognitive, financial, and social functioning, support of healthy aging, and longevity. It leads to the hypothesis that people using cannabis long-term might be less prepared for the demands of old age. So far, only a handful of studies have evaluated cannabis users beyond their young adulthood. Therefore, Madeline H. Meier conducted extensive research on long-term cannabis users.
In this paper published in Lancet Healthy Longevity, Madeline H. Meier’s team tested if long-term cannabis users show accelerated biological aging in midlife and poorer health, financial, and social preparedness for old age. Participants of the study were a cohort of 1037 individuals from New Zealand, followed to the age of 45 years. Meier assessed cannabis, tobacco, and alcohol use and dependence at ages 18, 21, 26, 32, 38, and 45 years. Biological aging and health, social and financial preparedness for old age were estimated at the age of 45 years. Long-term cannabis users were compared with five different groups:
Long-term cannabis users presented statistically significant accelerated biological aging. They were also less prepared to manage later-life health, financial, and social demands than non-users. Long-term tobacco or alcohol users showed similar results. The study suggested that cannabis associations of long-term cannabis users were not linked to socioeconomic origins, childhood IQ, childhood self-control, or family substance-dependence history. Long-term cannabis users also tended to polysubstance dependence, which impacted the accelerated biological aging and poor financial and health preparedness but not their poor social preparedness.
Long-term cannabis use seems to be the culprit, but the real challenge to healthy aging is not the use of any specific substance but rather the long-term use of multiple substances, which many users pursue. Holistic midlife interventions for long-term cannabis users are needed to support them in building their health, financial, and social capital and help sustain them through later life. Quitting cannabis may help with this goal. Efforts are also needed to provide the same help for long-term tobacco and alcohol users.